« March 2006 »
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

You are not logged in. Log in
Open Community
Post to this Blog

Helpful Links
Angelfire Home
Register Your Domain
Angelfire's Twitter
Angelfire's Facebook

Angelfire Club Blog
Need assistance and ideas from fellow Angelfire members to help build and manage your website? You've come to the right place!
To join this Community Blog, you must be an Angelfire member. Just click the "Join this Community" link, and start posting immediately.

Hint: When posting, select a topic that most relates to your question. (News, FrontPage, HTML Questions, etc...) This will help to keep the blog organized for everyone.

View Latest Entries

Wednesday, 1 March 2006
Image sizes
What is the recommended maximum width size for a jpg? I've been using 840 as a boundary and it seems to fit well on the computers I use. However, I went to a computer with a large screen today (it's used mainly for Quark layout), and my 840 photo was larger than the screen. Is that due to that monitor's settings, or are a lot of viewers of my page having to move the pic to see all of it? I don't want them to have to do that, unless they're still on a Kaypro II.

Posted by az3/goladyjags at 7:05 PM EST | Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post

Wednesday, 1 March 2006 - 7:54 PM EST

Name: cw

It's not the size of the screen. It's the resolution the screen is set for that's important. Most computers can be set for any of several at will. It used to be that 800 x 600 resolution was the most common in use. Now more people are using larger resolutions like 1024 x 768 and above.

Resolution means how many pixels across and down can display on the screen... but you also have to take a browser window interface into account as that takes up some screen room, too. How much room the browser takes up also varies by the browser. If you have a stats counter, screen resolution is usually returned as a stat so you can check what resolutions your own visitors are using.

Anyway, if this were me, I'd size for the smallest common denominator or screen resolution expected which in my own case would be 800x600. I'd size the largest pics no more than 780 pixels wide. That should accomodate most everybody without anyone needing to scroll left to right.

Wednesday, 1 March 2006 - 9:09 PM EST

Name: az3/goladyjags

Thanks, Chris. I never thought about accommodating viewers before.

View Latest Entries