Sunday, 1 January 2006 - 4:11 PM EST
Name:
tom
CW:
Of course, you are 100% correct, in saying that a domain
name should point to a folder, rather than to a simple
html page.
In the original posting, the blogger asked:
"Is it possible to have more than one site within a site?
How does a person allow others to see the sites without going through the index page?"
I think the confusion stems from the 'site within a site'
phrase. Sometimes folks mistakenly call 'webpages', sites.
I know that 'early on', in my site building experience, I made the same
error.
In other words, I feel that the blogger originally wished
to know, if surfers may access pages on the site, without the
necessity of going through the index page.
The blogger also wrote: "I would like to insert 2 sites on different topics within the original site but I don't want people to go through the index page first"
The question we must ask, is the following:
Is the blogger actually referring to 'sites' or 'webpages'?
Maybe a domain or sub-domain is not necessary at all.
The surfers may be directed to the specific page,
by using the Angelfire top-level directory URL, such as:
www.angelfire.com/mn3/dnrdocuments/casscounty.html
rather than:
www.angelfire.com/mn3/dnrdocuments/CassCounty/index.html
[I think also that capital letters would be best avoided in file names and URLs]
I guess that my main objection to using sub-directories, is the
fact that the files are not visible immediately in the webshell;
one must access the directory in question. There is also the possibilty
of uploading files to the wrong directory. Confusion also arises
with the URLs used in HTML files. The more complicated they are,
the greater possibility of error.
My knowledge is rudimentary, to say the least......
I am almost embarrassed to voice my opnions amongst such highly
skilled personages as CW & Dalleh :)